Can inline AI use my existing PowerPoint file and company template?

Yes. inline AI reads an existing .pptx or approved company template as reference, then carries its master, layouts, theme colors, typography, and footer rules into a new finished .pptx. It does not currently edit an existing PowerPoint file in place.

Can it turn Excel data into charts in PowerPoint?

Yes. inline AI reads Excel and CSV data, reconciles totals and units, and selects charts based on the question—comparison, trend, mix, or contribution. It also writes the assertion headline and adds data labels, reporting dates, and sources.

Can it turn a long report and several files into one presentation?

Yes. inline AI can read Word, HWP, PDF, Excel, existing PowerPoint, and image files together, remove duplication, and restructure the material for the audience and purpose. It designs the sequence of conclusions and evidence rather than merely summarizing each source.

What makes the result feel like a top-tier consulting deck?

It starts with the decision, uses assertion headlines, reduces each slide to one claim, and connects every claim to evidence. Charts answer a specific question, sources remain traceable, and the appendix is structured for the objections most likely to come up in the room.

Can inline AI write the speaker notes?

Yes. It can add the message to emphasize, the source behind each figure, transitions to the next slide, and anticipated questions to speaker notes. For executive decks, it can also close with a final slide stating exactly what needs approving and by when, along with the owner, budget, and timing.

PowerPoint

One prompt away from a consulting-grade deck.One prompt away from a consulting-grade deck.

Drop in the spreadsheets, PDFs, and meeting notes. You get slides that lead with the answer.

A consulting-grade deck, in a single pass

The kind of deck McKinsey, BCG, and Bain hand to a boardroom — built from the files you already have.

AutoSaveOffH2_2026_Growth_Strategy_Operating_Review

FileHomeInsertDrawDesignTransitionsAnimationsSlide ShowReviewViewCommentsShare

Why customers choose us

Unit economics

Where to focus

90-day execution plan

Risks and leading indicators

Decisions required

03 · STRATEGIC OPTIONSEXECUTIVE DECISION PACK

Concentrate 70% of sales capacity on public-sector enterprise instead of pursuing every segment

Six public-sector wins generated 83% of H1 net-new revenue, with a payback period 4.1 months shorter than commercial accounts.

Exhibit 1 · Weighted option scoring

Actuals as of Jun 30, 2026

Decision criteriaWt.

OPTION A

Maintain all segments

OPTION B · REC

Focus public sector

OPTION C

Expand commercial

Net-new revenue

H1 actuals

25%

17%$0.50M

83%$2.45M

31%$0.91M

12-mo retention

Cohort basis

20%

83%17% churn

94%6% churn

87%13% churn

Payback period

CAC recovery

25%

18.2 mo

9.7 mo

13.8 mo

Proposal lead time

Kickoff to bid

15%

42 days3 bid docs

24 daysStd. package

38 daysBespoke

Team required

Sales + PM

15%

+5$0.5M cost

+3$0.3M cost

+4$0.4M cost

Weighted score (10)

4.6

8.7

6.1

REC

Redirect 30% of commercial campaign spend to the bid team and launch three agency pilots by September.

Owner

Public sector team

Reallocation

$0.9M

Start

Sep 1, 2026

Read the strategy draft, performance workbook, and customer interviews, then rebuild them into a ten-slide operating-review deck. Cut the exposition and make the headlines tell the full argument on their own.

Your logic, drawn as charts that argue

Comparison, trend, mix, contribution — inline AI works out what you are proving and draws the chart that proves it.

AutoSaveOffH1_2026_Board_Business_Review

FileHomeInsertDrawDesignTransitionsAnimationsSlide ShowReviewViewCommentsShare

Executive summary

Revenue and operating profit

Growth contribution

Revenue mix

Cohort retention

Pipeline conversion

04 · SOURCE OF GROWTHEXECUTIVE BUSINESS REVIEW

H1 revenue grew 18.5%, but 83% of the increase came from six public-sector wins

Flat self-serve ARPU and a softer commercial pipeline are the primary risks to the H2 plan.

Exhibit 1 · Revenue by segment

H1 2025H1 2026

Growth share

Public sector

6.14

8.59

83%

+39.9%

Commercial

3.82

0.0%

Self-serve

5.97

6.47

17%

+8.4%

02.55.07.510

Exhibit 2 · Bridge of the $2.95M increase

15.93

+2.45

0.00

+0.50

18.88

H1 2025PublicComm.Self-serveH1 2026

$18.88M+18.5%

H1 revenue

48% of FY

14.2%+2.6ppt

Adj. operating margin

Target 15%

71%+9ppt

Annual-plan conversion

Target 80%

1.8x-0.9x

Commercial coverage

Bar 3.0x

Build the board deck from the H1 actuals, CRM pipeline, and cohort workbook. Do not paste tables—design a sequence of charts that explains contribution, customer mix, retention, and pipeline coverage.

Only what the decision actually needs

Reports, meeting notes, interviews, spreadsheets — read all at once, then cut down to the issues that matter and the evidence behind them.

AutoSaveOffNew_Market_Entry_Executive_Deck_10_Slides

FileHomeInsertDrawDesignTransitionsAnimationsSlide ShowReviewViewCommentsShare

New market entry

Executive summary

Why now

Unmet customer demand

Where we can win

Economic scenarios

01 · EXECUTIVE SUMMARYEXECUTIVE DECISION PACK

1,286 pages were reduced to the three questions management must decide

The conclusions on market, economics, and execution are supported by 47 evidence points across ten core slides and an eighteen-slide appendix.

Source material

1,286p

PDF

Market and competitors

846p

25 cited

DOCX

Customer interviews

11 cited

XLSX

Business case model

18 assum.

7 cited

HWP

Committee issues

11 Qs

4 cited

PPTX

Existing draft deck

42 slides

17 dupes

Evidence linked in deck47

Missing sources0

Conflicts resolved3

As-of date alignedJun 30

Compression

1,286pSource

412Claims

47Verified

3Questions

Exhibit 1 · The three decisions

A broad entry would destroy focus

Public sector and enterprise account for 72% of the profit pool.

Limit stage one to those two segments.

Evidence · Market compendium p.212–248, benchmark p.31

72%

Profit pool

Segments

Reports read

Competitors

Customers fund compliance, not features

19 of 24 interviews named security and audit as the buying trigger.

Lead the positioning with compliance, not features.

Evidence · 24 interviews, coding sheet R-02

19/24

Budget confirmed

+38%

Willingness gap

417

Statements coded

Regimes named

Partner-led entry breaks even sooner

Base-case payback improves from 14.8 months to 9.7 months.

Sign a partner before any direct build-out.

Evidence · Business case v8, scenario B tab

5.1 mo

Payback saved

-9 mo

Certification

Scenarios

Assumptions

10 core slides + 18 evidence slides

Answer

1–2

Market

3–4

Economics

5–6

Execution

7–10

Appendix

A1–A18

The core deck carries only what the decision requires; calculations, interview excerpts, and competitor evidence remain directly traceable in the appendix.

Read the market research, customer interviews, business model, and steering notes. Build a ten-slide market-entry deck the CEO can decide from in twenty minutes, with every calculation linked to an appendix.

Speaker notes come with it

What to say on each slide, the pushback you will get, the answer, and the backup. Open the file and you are ready for the room.

AutoSaveOffNew_Business_Investment_Committee_Brief

FileHomeInsertDrawDesignTransitionsAnimationsSlide ShowReviewViewCommentsShare

Economic scenarios

Partner-led entry

Execution roadmap

Decision request

Questions and answers

Evidence appendix map

09 · MEETING BRIEFEXECUTIVE DECISION PACK

Every likely question can be answered with evidence in under fifteen seconds

A twenty-minute talk track, twelve anticipated questions, concise answers, and eighteen evidence slides are now linked page by page.

Talk track

20 min · to scale

0:00

Answer and ask first1–2

Approve a partner-led entry into public sector and enterprise, not a broad launch

2:30

Compliance is the buying trigger3–4

Use the 19 funded-budget interviews instead of top-down market size

8:00

9.7-month payback5–6

Walk the three base-case assumptions and the 16.4-month downside together

15:00

Roadmap and stop conditions7–10

Close on 18-month milestones, stop conditions, and the three decisions needed

DECISION REQUIRED TODAY

Approve the $2.0M first-stage budget and authorize partner negotiations.

Budget

$2.0M

Horizon

18 months

Stop gate

3 pilots

Exhibit 1 · Likely questions and one-line answers

Top 6 of 12

When do we break even if growth halves?

The downside case still reaches break-even in 16.4 months, inside the stop condition.

HighA-04

Why partner instead of entering directly?

Certification and procurement access arrive nine months sooner.

HighA-07

What proves customers will actually pay?

Nineteen of twenty-four interviews confirmed audit readiness as a funded need.

HighA-11

Does this compete with the core business?

Three dedicated hires keep it separate; existing targets stay unchanged.

MedA-13

How large is the stage-two investment?

Stage two returns as its own paper once three pilots report conversion.

MedA-16

What if a competitor copies the move?

Only five partners hold the certification, so moving first buys a 12-month lead.

MedA-18

Evidence ready to open

A-043 cases

Sensitivity, break-even

A-074 criteria

Entry-model comparison

A-1119

Customer verbatims

A-1318 mo

Sales capacity plan

A-169 assum.

Stage-two assumptions

A-185 cos.

Competitor response

The talk track, likely objections, and underlying evidence stay connected, so the presenter never has to search for the answer in the room.

I have twenty minutes with the investment committee tomorrow. Write the speaker notes for each slide, anticipate the questions, and prepare one-sentence answers. Link every answer to the exact evidence slide in the appendix.

“

Gathering the material took a day. Turning it into something that could actually persuade anyone took three more. Now the first draft already has the conclusion and the evidence sitting together.

Frequently Asked Questions

Hand over the files. Get a deck the room can decide on.

Storyline, sourced charts, executive summary, speaker notes — one finished PowerPoint file.

Get Download LinkDownload forWindows

Only what the decision actually needs

Reports, meeting notes, interviews, spreadsheets — read all at once, then cut down to the issues that matter and the evidence behind them.

AutoSaveOffNew_Market_Entry_Executive_Deck_10_Slides

FileHomeInsertDrawDesignTransitionsAnimationsSlide ShowReviewViewCommentsShare

New market entry

Executive summary

Why now

Unmet customer demand

Where we can win

Economic scenarios

01 · EXECUTIVE SUMMARYEXECUTIVE DECISION PACK

1,286 pages were reduced to the three questions management must decide

The conclusions on market, economics, and execution are supported by 47 evidence points across ten core slides and an eighteen-slide appendix.

Source material

1,286p

PDF

Market and competitors

846p

25 cited

DOCX

Customer interviews

11 cited

XLSX

Business case model

18 assum.

7 cited

HWP

Committee issues

11 Qs

4 cited

PPTX

Existing draft deck

42 slides

17 dupes

Evidence linked in deck47

Missing sources0

Conflicts resolved3

As-of date alignedJun 30

Compression

1,286pSource

412Claims

47Verified

3Questions

Exhibit 1 · The three decisions

A broad entry would destroy focus

Public sector and enterprise account for 72% of the profit pool.

Limit stage one to those two segments.

Evidence · Market compendium p.212–248, benchmark p.31

72%

Profit pool

Segments

Reports read

Competitors

Customers fund compliance, not features

19 of 24 interviews named security and audit as the buying trigger.

Lead the positioning with compliance, not features.

Evidence · 24 interviews, coding sheet R-02

19/24

Budget confirmed

+38%

Willingness gap

417

Statements coded

Regimes named

Partner-led entry breaks even sooner

Base-case payback improves from 14.8 months to 9.7 months.

Sign a partner before any direct build-out.

Evidence · Business case v8, scenario B tab

5.1 mo

Payback saved

-9 mo

Certification

Scenarios

Assumptions

10 core slides + 18 evidence slides

Answer

1–2

Market

3–4

Economics

5–6

Execution

7–10

Appendix

A1–A18

The core deck carries only what the decision requires; calculations, interview excerpts, and competitor evidence remain directly traceable in the appendix.

Read the market research, customer interviews, business model, and steering notes. Build a ten-slide market-entry deck the CEO can decide from in twenty minutes, with every calculation linked to an appendix.

One prompt away from a consulting-grade deck.One prompt away from a consulting-grade deck.

A consulting-grade deck, in a single pass

The headlines carry the argument

The answer arrives by slide three

“Where did that number come from?”

The headlines carry the argument

The answer arrives by slide three

“Where did that number come from?”

Your logic, drawn as charts that argue

Never pick a chart type again

The totals always tie out

Every chart says what it means

Never pick a chart type again

The totals always tie out

Every chart says what it means

Only what the decision actually needs

It reads the 1,286 pages for you

Down to three real issues

Nothing gets thrown away

It reads the 1,286 pages for you

Down to three real issues

Nothing gets thrown away

Speaker notes come with it

The words are already written

You get the questions in advance

Evidence in fifteen seconds

The words are already written

You get the questions in advance

Evidence in fifteen seconds

Frequently Asked Questions

Can inline AI use my existing PowerPoint file and company template?

Can it turn Excel data into charts in PowerPoint?

Can it turn a long report and several files into one presentation?

What makes the result feel like a top-tier consulting deck?

Can inline AI write the speaker notes?

Hand over the files. Get a deck the room can decide on.

Turn your PC into an AI computer.

One prompt away from a consulting-grade deck.One prompt away from a consulting-grade deck.

A consulting-grade deck, in a single pass

The headlines carry the argument

The answer arrives by slide three

“Where did that number come from?”

The headlines carry the argument

The answer arrives by slide three

“Where did that number come from?”

Your logic, drawn as charts that argue

Never pick a chart type again

The totals always tie out

Every chart says what it means

Never pick a chart type again

The totals always tie out

Every chart says what it means

Only what the decision actually needs

It reads the 1,286 pages for you

Down to three real issues

Nothing gets thrown away

It reads the 1,286 pages for you

Down to three real issues

Nothing gets thrown away

Speaker notes come with it

The words are already written

You get the questions in advance

Evidence in fifteen seconds

The words are already written

You get the questions in advance

Evidence in fifteen seconds

Frequently Asked Questions

Can inline AI use my existing PowerPoint file and company template?

Can it turn Excel data into charts in PowerPoint?

Can it turn a long report and several files into one presentation?

What makes the result feel like a top-tier consulting deck?

Can inline AI write the speaker notes?

Hand over the files. Get a deck the room can decide on.